Joris De Loore vs Matic Dimic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Recently, Loore has won 41.95% of their second serve points, while Dimic has a slightly better record at 44.83%. Could this slight edge aid Dimic in the match?
• Return Game Stats: Loore excels in returning second serves, winning 43.57% of points, compared to Dimic's 40%. On first serve returns, however, Dimic significantly outperforms Loore with 42.86% against 22.31%.
• Pressure Performance: Under pressure, Loore saves 48.57% of break points, a notable contrast to Dimic's 36.84%. How crucial will this difference be during pivotal moments in the match?
• Overall Match Wins: Over the past year, both players have similar win rates: Loore at 57.69% and Dimic at 57.14%.
• Best Surface: Loore performs best on hard courts with a 68% win rate. Dimic's most successful surface is clay, winning 55% of matches.
• Player Level: Loore has a higher win percentage of 66.67% at Futures/ITF $10K events compared to Dimic's 57.14% in the same category.
• Opponent Quality: Over the past year, Loore faced opponents with an average rank of 398.23, whereas Dimic's opponents were ranked at an average of 259.2.
• Deciding Sets: If the match goes to a deciding set, Dimic is slightly more reliable, having won 86% of such sets, compared to Loore's 57%.
• Break Point Conversion: Currently, Dimic converts 33.33% of break points, more than double Loore's 14.63% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent performance statistics of both players highlights some intriguing aspects that could influence the outcome of this match. Dimic edges slightly ahead in second serve effectiveness, which could prove pivotal if the match extends to critical serving games.

In terms of returning capability, although Dimic is stronger on first serve returns, Loore excels against second serves, likely keeping the pressure on Dimic’s serve throughout.

Loore demonstrates resilience under pressure, saving a higher percentage of break points than Dimic. However, Dimic's superior break point conversion rate could still pose a challenge.

Both have similar recent win rates, yet Loore shows a preference and strength on hard courts, which could play to their advantage if conditions match.

Considering all aspects, including opponent quality and deciding set performance, Dimic seems slightly more consistent, especially in high-stakes scenarios.

Taking into account all these statistics, Dimic appears to be the slight favorite to win this upcoming match, although Loore’s strengths on their preferred surface could level the playing field.